Introduction to Electroscopes
The Invention of Electroscopes
It is probably fair to say that the electroscope was invented in 1746 by the Frenchman Jean Nollet, but that the gold leaf electroscope (which is what we generally think of when we think of electroscopes) was invented by the Englishman, Abraham Bennet (Phil. Trans. 77, p. 26, 1787).
The Purpose of
The primary function
of the electroscope has always been to demonstrate various electrostatic
phenomena, e.g., conduction and induction of electric charges.
Nevertheless, the electroscope has played a significant role in the
measurement of radiation and radioactive substances. This was particularly
true in the first few decades that followed the discovery of x-rays in
Wilhelm Rontgen and radioactivity in 1896 by Henri Becquerel. In
fact, the electroscope was one of the most important devices used by these
two men for their measurements. Even today, electroscopes are still used
to measure radiation: the pocket dosimeters that many facilities assign to
visitors are actually quartz fiber electroscopes!
Element of Electroscopes
The sensing element of
the earliest electroscopes consisted of one or two thin metallic (e.g.,
gold) leaves. In the 1930s,
those performing measurements of radiation and radioactivity began
switching to quartz fiber electroscopes. The latter were rugged, easy to
set up, and could be operated in any orientation. However,
because the quartz fibers can’t be seen without the aid of a microscope,
they don’t lend themselves to classroom demonstrations of electrostatic
The Basic Principle of Operation
For simplicity, the
following discussion assumes we are using a gold leaf electroscope.
The gold leaves (or
leaf) are first given an electrostatic charge that causes them to be
deflected from their normal resting position. Anything that then reduces
this charge causes the leaves to fall back towards their original
position. Radiation can do this if it ionizes the air in the vicinity of
the electroscope’s leaves (or a component of the electroscope in
electrical contact with the leaves). The rate at which the leaves move is
a measure of the intensity of the radiation.
The movement of the leaf might be observed with or without the aid of a
microscope. If a microscope
were used, it would incorporate a scale inside the eyepiece. If the leaves
were viewed by eye without the aid of a microscope, and quantitative
measurements were needed, some sort of scale might have been positioned behind
the leaf or leaves. On occasion, a telescope was used so as to observe the
movement of the leaves at a distance. This, for example, could reduce the
observer’s radiation exposures.
The movement of the leaf might be observed with or without the aid of a microscope. If a microscope were used, it would incorporate a scale inside the eyepiece. If the leaves were viewed by eye without the aid of a microscope, and quantitative measurements were needed, some sort of scale might have been positioned behind the leaf or leaves. On occasion, a telescope was used so as to observe the movement of the leaves at a distance. This, for example, could reduce the observer’s radiation exposures.
|The General Construction/Shape of Electroscopes|
As a rule, an
electroscope of the 1800s had a glass bell-jar shaped body and two gold
leaves that were suspended from the bottom of
a “lead-in” (aka conductor or support rod) that entered through the top of the electroscope.
Either a metal sphere or horizontal flat disk (Volta plate) was connected to the top of
Electroscopes of the late 1800s and early 1900s tended to be box-like or cylindrical. The body was mostly metal with two opposite sides made of glass. Instead of using two gold leaves, these instruments often employed a single leaf attached at its top to a stationary flat metal strip (figure on left).
An important advantage of these cylindrically shaped and box shaped electroscopes is that the two parallel glass windows permit the electroscope to be used with a projection system. This would project an image of the leaf or leaves, and their accompanying scale (if they had one), onto a remote screen. In a classroom setting this would allow everyone to see what was happening. Projection also enables very small movements of the leaves to be more accurately assessed.
Another way to observe very small deflections of the leaves would be to view them through a microscope. If the sensitive component were a quartz fiber instead of an aluminum or gold leaf (as in a Lauritsen electroscope), a microscope might be the only way to view it. In fact, a microscope might be an integral component of the electroscope - this would prevent the electroscope and the microscope from moving relative to each other while a measurement were being performed.
Electroscopes that were designed for measurements of radioactive substances were highly variable in their construction. While it is hard to generalize, they often employed a microscope to view the gold leaf or fiber, some sort of scale to permit quantitative measurements, and a drawer or chamber into which a radioactive sample could be placed. Although some commercially available instruments were specifically designed for measurements of radiation (e.g., Lind, Zeleny and Lauritsen electroscopes), it was often the case that the electroscopes were built by the researcher to meet their specific needs.
the Leaves to Increase Sensitivity
The sensitivity of some electroscopes could be increased by electrically separating the leaves from the lead-in by the use of an insulator. However, if this was done, it was necessary to employ a moveable rod for charging or grounding the leaves.
Last updated: 07/25/07
Copyright 1999, Oak Ridge Associated Universities